Buy and Hold? Debunked!
Please click on the following link, and scroll down to the third chart on the page (the chart of the Dow Jones average plotted on a logarithmic scale)
http://www.lowrisk.com/djia100year.htm
Today the "buy and hold" strategy is common wisdom among the investing public.
However, there have been several periods in recent history where stocks showed
a zero-percent return over time spans as long as 25 years! In other words, over
the last 100 years, Buy and Hold has worked for about 50 years and failed
spectacularly over about 50 years. That is only a 50% success rate, great if
you get your timing right, terrible if you don't!
Note that if you bought the Dow in 1927, you did not see a positive return
until almost 1950! And god forbid if you HAD to sell (due to some unexpected
personal expense occuring requiring an immediate cash outlay) at some point in
between those time periods, you could have lost as much as 75% of your original
capital!
The periods between approx. 1967 and 1982 and 1905 and 1920 also showed a
long-term zero return. Note that a savings account paying 3% (the lowliest form
of investment and currently spectacularly out of fashion), compounded over 15
years, would have left you dramatically better off than if you had stayed in
stocks!
The point is, every so often, we enter a period of flat stock market returns
that lasts between 10 and 25 years. Exactly how long that period of zero
returns is is different for each individual investor, and depends on the exact
timing of when you got in and when you got out. Or to restate, during those
periods, everyone did badly, but exactly HOW badly you did depended on your
exact market timing. But no matter how you slice it, a long stretch of
consecutive years with zero returns is devastating both in terms of losses to
inflation, and the opportunity cost of not being in a more profitable alternate
investment. One thing is for sure: those who got OUT of the stock market at
the beginning of--or even well into the middle of!-- a big downtrend and
invested their money in alternate investment vehicles did SIGNFICANTLY better
than those who weathered the long stretch of zero return.
There is every reason to believe that the Dow and S&P are just now following in
the footsteps of the Nasdaq decline between 2000 and 2001. I expect we may see
a fairly similar drop in the Dow and S&P over the next year. The Dow and S&P
are less volatile than the nasdaq, so figure maybe a Dow of 5000 (give or take)
and an S&P of 500 (give or take) So, most of the S&P and Dow losses could well
be in front of us, not behind us. In other words, even if you've lost some
"paper profits", the probability is, if you don't sell now, you'll lose WAY
more by staying in the market and watching the Dow and S&P plunge in a similar
fashion.
The lesson here: SELL any money you have in stocks or mutual funds that you
think you might need anytime in the next 20 years. This may be your last chance
for a LONG TIME to preserve your HARD-EARNED capital. You should also consider
redeploying at least SOME part of those funds you won't need for over 20 years
in order to avoid the opportunity cost of missing out on alternate (i.e.
possibly SUPERIOR) forms of investment, like money market funds, bonds, and
commodities like precious metals.
EYKIW!
Please click on the following link, and scroll down to the third chart on the page (the chart of the Dow Jones average plotted on a logarithmic scale)
http://www.lowrisk.com/djia100year.htm
Today the "buy and hold" strategy is common wisdom among the investing public.
However, there have been several periods in recent history where stocks showed
a zero-percent return over time spans as long as 25 years! In other words, over
the last 100 years, Buy and Hold has worked for about 50 years and failed
spectacularly over about 50 years. That is only a 50% success rate, great if
you get your timing right, terrible if you don't!
Note that if you bought the Dow in 1927, you did not see a positive return
until almost 1950! And god forbid if you HAD to sell (due to some unexpected
personal expense occuring requiring an immediate cash outlay) at some point in
between those time periods, you could have lost as much as 75% of your original
capital!
The periods between approx. 1967 and 1982 and 1905 and 1920 also showed a
long-term zero return. Note that a savings account paying 3% (the lowliest form
of investment and currently spectacularly out of fashion), compounded over 15
years, would have left you dramatically better off than if you had stayed in
stocks!
The point is, every so often, we enter a period of flat stock market returns
that lasts between 10 and 25 years. Exactly how long that period of zero
returns is is different for each individual investor, and depends on the exact
timing of when you got in and when you got out. Or to restate, during those
periods, everyone did badly, but exactly HOW badly you did depended on your
exact market timing. But no matter how you slice it, a long stretch of
consecutive years with zero returns is devastating both in terms of losses to
inflation, and the opportunity cost of not being in a more profitable alternate
investment. One thing is for sure: those who got OUT of the stock market at
the beginning of--or even well into the middle of!-- a big downtrend and
invested their money in alternate investment vehicles did SIGNFICANTLY better
than those who weathered the long stretch of zero return.
There is every reason to believe that the Dow and S&P are just now following in
the footsteps of the Nasdaq decline between 2000 and 2001. I expect we may see
a fairly similar drop in the Dow and S&P over the next year. The Dow and S&P
are less volatile than the nasdaq, so figure maybe a Dow of 5000 (give or take)
and an S&P of 500 (give or take) So, most of the S&P and Dow losses could well
be in front of us, not behind us. In other words, even if you've lost some
"paper profits", the probability is, if you don't sell now, you'll lose WAY
more by staying in the market and watching the Dow and S&P plunge in a similar
fashion.
The lesson here: SELL any money you have in stocks or mutual funds that you
think you might need anytime in the next 20 years. This may be your last chance
for a LONG TIME to preserve your HARD-EARNED capital. You should also consider
redeploying at least SOME part of those funds you won't need for over 20 years
in order to avoid the opportunity cost of missing out on alternate (i.e.
possibly SUPERIOR) forms of investment, like money market funds, bonds, and
commodities like precious metals.
EYKIW!
